Town of Hanover text logo:  
  river and dog 50x50:   pond and hills 50x50:   moose 50x50:   ferns 50x50:   fall trees 50x50:   daisies 50x50:  
Planning & Zoning text logo:
Municipal Building, 41 South Main St., Hanover, NH / 603-643-0708
 
 
  You are here: Home | Planning and Zoning | Open Space Priorities Plan [3]    Search
 
 


Jonathan Edwards, Director
Planning@HanoverNH.org


Applications

Planning
Master Plan
Planning Board
Site Plan Review
Subdivision Regulations

Rural Study Group 2007

Other Documents
Downtown Hanover Vision
Guiding Growth in Rural Hanover
'Something for Everyone' Scenic Locales Report
Class VI Roads In Hanover

Zoning
Zoning Board of Adjustment
Zoning Ordinance


Conservation
Conservation Commission
Open Space Priorities Plan
Trails
Flora and Fauna
Protected Lands

Affordable Housing
Affordable Housing Commission
Affordable Housing Study
Gile Tract Housing

Inspections
Building Code
Building Code Advisory Committee






Department Sitemap



 
 

Open Space Priorities Plan [3]

III. IN-TOWN OPEN SPACE ACTION AREAS

At the writing of this report, "in-town" is defined as extending from the Connecticut River west of the Rinker Tract and Oak Hill to and along Grasse Road to East Wheelock Street, then cross-country to the intersection of Lebanon Street and Greensboro Road, and south on Lebanon Street to the southern boundary of the Town of Hanover. (Although the Appalachian Trail and its buffers traverse this area, they are discussed in the Conservation/Recreation Action Areas chapter of this report.)

In the future, as areas of more dense population develop outside this definition of "in-town," spaces should be conserved in them that meet the general open space goals and/or the in-town open space criteria. For instance, the present open fields and forests both to the north and south of Greensboro Road are located in the BM (Service Business and Limited Manufacturing) Zone or the SR-2 (Single Residence-2) Zone and are subject to development. Obviously, if these areas are developed, much of the rural character of this landscape so close to town will change.

IN-TOWN OPEN SPACE BENEFITS

Open space, whether rural or in town, provides people with physical, mental and emotional refreshment. The town center is uniquely surrounded by the wooded banks of the Connecticut River to the west and by forested hillsides and ridgelines to the north and east. Visible from dozens of locations in the downtown area, the backdrop of Hanover's forested hills is highly prized by the many people who live, work in, and visit the town. Small open spaces found between commercial and institutional buildings or in residential areas are also highly valued. Additions to in-town open spaces would strengthen the already established pattern of village-scale combinations of development and open areas. In-town open spaces thus tend to fall into three types: 1.) the forested backdrop, 2.) smaller local parks and open spaces, and 3.) connections.

THE FORESTED BACKDROP

From the steep, woodland eskers of the Connecticut River banks to the nearby ridgelines to the east, the backdrop of forested hills defines the landscape character of downtown Hanover. Many people and groups have worked to build this highly visible natural area within walking distance of the downtown business and institutional district, schools, and residential neighborhoods. As with more rural open spaces, these in-town natural areas contribute to a healthy ecosystem by protecting water resources, diverse plant and animal natural communities, and wildlife corridors.

Because these natural areas are located in the area of town zoned for heaviest use, they are also critically important for:

· protecting the visual character of Hanover-a rural New England town surrounded by forest and mown fields;
· making publicly accessible connections to nature and various forms of recreation; and
· providing people with physical, mental and emotional refreshment.

The segments of this natural backdrop include (starting from the north of town):

· The Rinker Tract
· The Ferguson Field on Route 10, across from Kendal at Hanover
· Storrs Pond Recreation Area
· Oak Hill
· The natural area surrounding the Ray School, including a section along Camp Brook
· Camp Brook along Reservoir Road from near the Storrs Pond entrance to Grasse Road
· Balch Hill
· Velvet Rocks ridge, including the higher elevations and ridgeline to the south and east of the Velvet Rocks ridge above Sand Hill and Greensboro Road
· Mink Brook corridor to Buck Road trail along sewer easement to Hanover Conservation Council Nature Preserve, the Tanzi Track Nature Preserve, and to City of Lebanon Indian Ridge conservation land through Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
· Mink Brook corridor through Tanzi Track to western part of Hanover Conservation Council Nature Preserve over South Main Street (Route 10) to the North and South Esker Nature Preserves, Pine Park Cemetery and the Connecticut River
· North Esker Nature Preserve north along the Connecticut River, including land west of the Dartmouth College campus, the Dartmouth College golf course, and Pine Park Association land
· To the east of the golf course and Lyme Road (practice golf course and the town-owned easement along Girl Brook connect back to Balch Hill and the Ray School campus and nature preserve)
· Kendal at Hanover conservation easement (not publicly accessible) to the Ferguson conserved land on Lyme Road, thus completes the circle to Storrs Pond and the Rinker Tract.

While each of these areas is, or should be, protected, not all are or should be open for public use. Privately held lands protected by conservation easement are an important component for the preservation of our town character and healthy environment.

SMALLER LOCAL PARKS AND OPEN SPACES

The second type of in-town open space is typically smaller and more locally used. The Valley News on September 3, 2000 notes that, "Although Hanover is among New Hampshire's wealthiest communities, the town is park-poor." The in-town area has few green spaces and pocket parks for recreation or for people to sit, rest, wait, gather and chat, where parents and grandparents can sit with baby carriages and watch older children play. The Herb Garden, almost the only quiet outdoor public place near Main Street, is located in a somewhat obscure location on West Wheelock Street away from where most people walk, park, or do business.

The best in-town open spaces are planned, distinctly shaped, and enjoyed by many people. They tend to be partially enclosed or to have a sense of being special places. Outdoor spaces that are merely "left over" between buildings are, in general, unplanned and not used to their potential. The square in front of Hanover's municipal building or the newly dedicated "Dagmar's Place" are examples of successful open spaces. The gap between the Ledyard and Citizens Banks on Main Street, created when the Tanzi Brothers Market and Fruit Stand burned on New Year's Day 1976 , has the potential- as-yet unrealized- to become an enjoyable outdoor courtyard.

The town planning and zoning regulations should be more effectively written to protect and/or create positive in-town open spaces. Current ordinances allow for the crowding of buildings, which narrows views and can create urban feelings of constriction and pressure- feelings not associated with a small New England town. The new building and parking garage on Lebanon Street has begun to impose this effect. Planning for trees and shade can mitigate the impact somewhat, but the principal planning focus should be on preserving more open space in the initial design, size and placement of buildings in relation to their surroundings.

The Dartmouth Green is the most well known open space in town and is a widely recognized symbol of Hanover. It serves many groups and individuals in all seasons, it connects the college with the town, and preserves a sense of openness and green space in the center of our increasingly urban downtown district.

Visible from Lebanon Street, one of the most heavily traveled streets in town, the open playing fields on the Dresden School grounds also serve many groups of people. Flat, safe, easily accessible recreation land owned by the Town is practically non-existent. With Dartmouth College's increasing need to limit use of their athletic fields by outside groups, the preservation of the Dresden School open fields is essential. Centrally located, these fields are used by people of all abilities and ages for exercise, family games, and community events like athletic games and contests at all times of day and evening. They are conveniently located across the street from the town's senior housing complex, and near several single-family neighborhoods and many apartment buildings. These open green spaces should be permanently protected for the use of the entire community.

The Hanover Country Club golf course is also used for winter sports-cross-country skiing, sledding- andyear-round for walking.

Herb garden on West Wheelock Street is
a place of respite.

Storrs Pond Recreation area is used for camping, swimming, tennis and walking.

The Dartmouth Green is the physical link between the college campus and Main Street- sometimes peaceful, often full of student activity.

Dagmar's Place is a new playground for young children.

Ideally, every in-town neighborhood should be within a three- to five-minute walk of both an informal open space (a forested trail or undeveloped area) and a more planned open space (a playing field, tot lot, public garden or park). Neighborhood parks provide children with places to play near home and people of all ages with places to meet their neighbors. Local parks should be an important element of the residential development pattern in town.

CONNECTIONS

Connections from downtown to walking paths, bike paths, and outward to conservation/recreation areas in the more rural parts of town are important and should be readily available. Existing open space and paths should be permanently protected and new ones established to link Hanover's in-town area with the countryside.

CRITERIA FOR IN-TOWN OPEN SPACE ACTION AREAS

In-town open spaces should be evaluated according to one or more of the following criteria:
· be visible from public streets or from within buildings;
· increase the town's surrounding natural areas;
· provide views of surrounding ridgelines and hilltops, such as Velvet Rocks, Balch Hill or Oak Hill, or of water bodies like Mink Brook, Occum Pond or the Connecticut River;
· provide walking and biking connections between residential, business and natural areas;
· be designated and designed as small pocket parks, tot lots, gardens, or playgrounds for people of all ages and abilities;
· provide open spaces that are close to each neighborhood, preferably within an three- to five-minute walk;
· provide common open space in all new downtown development. (Since these spaces are intended to serve immediate residents, they could be owned by development residents through a homeowner's or condominium association or similar legal entity.)

IN-TOWN ACTIONS

Potential in-town open space action areas are discussed by action needed as part of the plan in Chapter IV. Hanover's existing in-town open space areas are listed and shown in Appendix III.

IV. THE OPEN SPACE PRIORITIES PLAN

Guiding this Open Space Priorities Plan is a vision of Hanover in times to come, a town shaped physically by its varied topography, generous open spaces, and various built structures, and with every resident assured of a stable and bountiful resource base, and a variety of conveniently located outdoor recreation opportunities. The plan encourages stewardship of our cultural and natural surroundings, and both municipal and voluntary citizen participation in achieving open space goals.

The goals of the Open Space Priorities Plan, as stated in Chapter I, are:

· To promote the conservation, protection and sound management of the natural resource base;
· To protect and enhance the ecological integrity of the town's diverse natural communities and wildlife habitats;
· To sustain the scenic quality and visual character of the town;
· To maintain and expand landscape-based recreational and educational opportunities;
· To protect and preserve the town's historic sites and cultural landscapes; and
· To protect and preserve existing in-town open space.

Eleven specific areas of Hanover have been identified in this plan for permanent protection. While some may be conserved through regulation and donation, there will be instances where the town will need to purchase land or rights to the land in order to secure open spaces. This plan is thus meant to ensure the thoughtful expenditure of public moneys from the town's Conservation Fund. (See Chapter V) It is also meant to provide meaningful input for the town Master Plan; and to encourage land-protection actions by individuals, and by nonprofit organizations such as the Upper Valley Land Trust , the Hanover Conservation Council and the Appalachian Trail Conference Land Trust.

The plan is in four parts:
· General Recommendations
· Uses of the Conservation Fund
· Conservation/Recreation Action Area Recommendations
· In-town Action Area Recommendations

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS

1. All the various techniques for expanding Hanover's open space system should be vigorously pursued.
2. The realities of real estate transactions dictate that opportunistic action should be taken when properties meeting the benefits criteria of this plan become available within any of the action areas. In this manner, over the long term, individual tracts of land will become linked to create a connected open space system.
3. Expenditures from the Conservation Fund should be committed when serious efforts to find other means have been exhausted or when the Conservation Fund can leverage significant other sources of revenue.
4. A standing Land Conservation Committee should be created by the Conservation Commission. Membership should include Commission members, and other local officials, as well as residents and representatives of the Upper Valley Land Trust, Hanover Conservation Council and Appalachian Trail Conference Land Trust. The Land Conservation Committee should:
· encourage and solicit open space protection projects;
· evaluate projects in which the town might become involved;
· report recommendations to the Conservation Commission;
· establish standards for conservation easements to be granted to the town;
· protect from development parcels without maintained public road access and parcels which rely on Class VI road frontage;

Travellers on Route 10 enjoy the view of this protected field.

· fill in missing links between existing protected open space lands and trail segments;
· establish new trails as appropriate throughout the town; and encourage linkages between in-town and rural open spaces;
· maintain an active relationship with local, regional and statewide land trusts; and
· seek a location for a public garden.
5. The Conservation Commission should also:
· foster volunteer stewardship efforts to annually monitor town-held easements and to maintain trails and open space lands;
· propose a zoning change to prohibit new residential construction in Hanover's Forestry (F") Zone;
· work to maintain the "F" Zone designation for the Water Company lands and elsewhere;
· propose a ridgeline protection ordinance, particularly on Lord's Hill, Moose Mountain, Balch Hill, Pinneo Hill, Huntington Hill, Oak Hill, Hayes Hill and Velvet Rocks;
· propose a zoning change to allow telecommunications facilities on pre-existing structures only;
· encourage the institution of transfer of development rights;
· create a municipal Connecticut River management plan as recommended in the Upper Valley Region portion of the Connecticut River Corridor Management Plan, June 1997;
· encourage universal access to a variety of appropriate open spaces throughout the town;
· work to leverage resources by pursuing State, Federal and private partners and funding sources in conservation projects;
· evaluate which Class VI roads should become public trails pursuant to RSA 231-A; and
· establish close relationships with neighboring conservation commissions to identify and act on areas of mutual benefit.
6. The town Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision and Site Plan regulations, should be revised and administered to preserve and protect open spaces through a variety of provisions. These may include: planned residential and open space development, dedication of public parks, open space and trail easements, streetscapes and other urban open areas, limitations on building heights and setbacks, grading, tree removal and width of right-of-ways.
7. Support wildlife monitoring research in all conservation/recreation action areas.

USES OF THE CONSERVATION FUND

1. The Conservation Fund should be used to leverage additional support for implementation of this open space plan.
2. The Conservation Fund should be used to support land protection initiatives of the Commission's conservation partners for town projects that meet the plan's benefits criteria, primarily in the rural areas of town.
3. Land protection assistance, as described in Chapter V, should be offered to private landowners who wish to voluntarily protect their property. Each year, $20,000 should be made available and granted by the Conservation Commission to conserve open space priority lands.
4. A stewardship fund of $30,000 should be created to support enforcement of the conservation easements held by the town. Thereafter, the fund should be increased at the rate of $1800 for each new easement accepted for town stewardship.
5. Three thousand dollars should be allocated each year from the Conservation Fund to work with land trusts to permanently protect town-owned conservation lands.
6. Up to $500 should be available each year for management of town-owned land, to publicly encourage its use, and to develop a volunteer stewardship program including training for volunteers, workshop materials, etc.

CONSERVATION/RECREATION ACTION AREA RECOMMENDATIONS

The open space protection purposes for each conservation/recreation area are given below to assist in the evaluation of potential projects. They are followed by lists of some specific action suggestions.

Appalachian Trail Buffers
Purpose: to provide an ample buffer around the footpath of the AT to sustain and increase its wilderness surroundings; to ensure a viable corridor for wildlife; and to retain a woodland backdrop to the areas through which the trail passes.

1. Work with the Appalachian Trail Conference (ATC) Land Trust to establish buffers where the trail is narrow, and to conserve other properties near the trail.
2. Make Conservation Fund money available to match ATC Land Trust funds to conserve properties near the Appalachian Trail and in the Trail viewshed.
3. Recommend that the ATC work with the appropriate landowners to connect the School District parcel in the MMW area with the AT.

The Appalachian Trail connects Hanover to thousands of miles of hiking trails in more than a dozen states.

Connecticut River
Purpose: to prevent shoreline erosion; to sustain wildlife habitat; to protect as much natural wooded view from the river as possible; to preserve important views of the river; and to provide increased access to the river.

1. Increase opportunities for public access to and use of the river.
2. Create a continuous trail along the river.
3. Protect views of the river from public roads and trails.
4. Ask U.S. Generating Company to place a conservation easement on their island in the Connecticut River.

Lord's Hill
Purpose: to sustain a substantial wildlife habitat area, and to keep it well connected to other conservation areas; to protect views to and from hillsides and ridgelines of Lord's Hill; to provide a wooded backdrop for development along Dogford and Two Mile Roads; and to create a pedestrian trail system which includes the historic Wolfeboro Road layout, and which provides a hub to connect many existing trails.

1. Hold a neighborhood gathering to discuss conservation of open space on Lord's Hill.
2. Establish a public trail network within the Lord's Hill conservation area that links with adjoining conservation areas and trails.
3. Re-establish a public trail on the alignment formerly occupied by Wolfeboro Road.
4. Protect views from and to Lord's Hill.

Lyme Connection
Purpose: to extend Hanover's recreation and wildlife corridors by establishing a pedestrian path to connect Slade Brook and the Doyle property to the Menge conservation easement area in Lyme; and to connect currently isolated portions of Hanover, such as Mulherrin Farms, to the existing trail network.

1. Request Town Meeting to designate Wardrobe Road as a public trail, because of its unique characteristic as a connector to protected property in Lyme.

Mink Brook Corridor
Purpose: to protect water quality, wetlands and habitat in the entire Mink Brook watershed; to protect a historically important element (the brook and its mill foundations) of the Etna section of Hanover; to ensure groundwater recharge of the underlying aquifers; and to create a continuous footpath from the Connecticut River to Moose Mountain.

1. Protect wetlands and unique habitat areas in the Mink Brook watershed.
2. Protect a continuous path preferably along the brook from the Connecticut River to Moose Mountain.
3. Complete the Etna Walkway.
4. Support the Mink Brook Land Protection Plan under development by the Hanover Conservation Council.
5. Develop a companion protection plan for management of the town's Mink Brook lands and for privately owned lands.
6. Encourage Dartmouth College to protect with a conservation easement the nearby "Bottomless Pit", an exemplary level bog and acidic seepage swamp community, thereby enlarging and making more accessible the protected area adjacent to it.

Monahan Valley
Purpose: to provide a pathway and wildlife corridor connecting the AT with the Slade Brook area; to protect ground water aquifers in the vicinity of Hanover Center; and to protect an important water source fro the Third Hanover reservoir.

1. Encourage conservation easements on lands with existing protective covenants.
2. Hold neighborhood meetings focused on protecting other lands in Monahan Valley.
3. Protect the Cory Road bridge and surrounding properties.

Moose Mountain East
Purpose: to protect water quality in the watersheds of Scales and Pressey Brooks by limiting further development; to augment the multi-town forest block that provides the region with a sustainable core of viable wildlife habitat; and to provide for wilderness recreation.
1. Properties which would expand the Town Forest, Appalachian Trail corridor and the Marshall/Pressey Brook wetland area should be protected to allow movement of animals through the area from the Appalachian Trail down to Canaan conservation land and Lyme.
2. Work with adjoining towns to protect the multi-town forest block and to encourage wildlife habitation.
3. See recommendations #1 and #2 for the AT Buffers.

Mowed fields offer occasional views of the east side of Moose Mountain.

Moose Mountain West
Purpose: to protect views to and from the hillsides and ridgelines of Moose Mountain; to protect the headwaters of Mink Brook; to provide connections between the AT, Slade Brook, and Mink Brook conservation/recreation areas; to benefit wildlife; and to provide a wooded backdrop to development in the rural residential part of town.

1. Encourage conservation easements to be placed on properties that abut Class VI roads and currently protected properties in the "F" Zone.
2. Seek a conservation easement on the Hanover School District's 60 acres near the northern edge of MMW.
3. Ask UNH to place an easement restricting further development on its 20-acre Moose Mountain ridgetop property on which the TV tower is located.
4. Recommend that the ATC work with the appropriate landowners to connect the School District parcel with the AT.
5. See recommendations #1 and #2 for the AT Buffers.

Slade Brook
Purpose: to provide recreational and wildlife connections from Moose Mountain and the Monahan Valley area to the Connecticut River; to buffer the brook and diverse natural and unusually steep lands along its course; and to ensure ground water recharge of the underlying aquifers.

1. Contact owners of unprotected properties about conserving their land in the lower Slade Brook valley.
2. Protect the two waterfalls on Slade Brook.
3. Establish a protected trail from Three Mile Road to the Connecticut River along the entire length of the brook.

Trail maintenance is an important part of the recreation system.

Water Company Land
Purpose: to make some or all of the land accessible for public recreation; to sustain wildlife habitat; to connect this area to nearby recreation and habitat areas; and to protect the reservoirs, natural areas and prime agricultural soils from the impacts of development.

1. Appoint a special task force to investigate permanent protection of the Water Company Lands.
2. Protect the lands by means of conservation easements.
3. If no longer needed for water supply, work to convert the Water Company lands to a public recreation and wildlife area.
4. Encoourage conservation easements to be placed on properties to the west and north of the Water Company Lands.
IN-TOWN OPEN SPACE ACTION AREA RECOMMENDATIONS

Purposes: to sustain and expand Hanover's in-town natural backdrop and smaller open spaces; to sustain and expand Hanover's physical amenities and recreational opportunites; and to strengthen the role of open space in all in-town planning and development.

Recommendations:
1. Reserve for in-town projects the half of the Land Use Change Tax that is automatically added annually to the Land Acquisition and Capital Improvements Fund for in-town projects.
2. Seek support for in-town open space projects from various organizations such as the Hanover Improvement Society and local neighborhood groups.
3. Enhance and permanently protect the natural backdrop surrounding the in-town areas.
4. Establish design controls in all town ordinances to maintain the appearance of a forested backdrop to in-town areas.
5. Seek and develop connections between in-town open spaces, and between in-town and rural open spaces.
6. Ensure that every residential neighborhood has a park or informal open space for local use within a 3- to 5-minute walk of most residences.
7. Ensure that all downtown development have publicly accessible open space. This should be reflected in the Town's Master Plan and land use ordinances as well as in the initial design, size and placement of buildings in relation to their surroundings.
8. Consider for continued open space or recreational use the follow open spaces in-town. (The Town-owned properties should be studied for permanent protection using conservation easements. Owners of privately-held open space are encouraged to permanently protect such land with conservation easements.)
· Tanzi Track
· Mink Brook-both sides and natural areas through corner of Lebanon Street and Greensboro Road
· Rinker Tract
· Ray School grounds and nature preserve
· Storrs Pond Recreation Area
· Oak Hill
· High School and Middle School playing fields
· Thompson Terrace playing field
· Balch Hill
· Open mown field east of North Balch, west of Smith Road
· Open mown field north of A-Lot, off East Wheelock
· Woodland surrounded by Ripley Road, School Street, and South Main Street
· Islands in the Connecticut River
· Dartmouth Green
· Bema and College Park
· Open space across East South Street from Hospice
· West Wheelock Herb Garden
· Occum Pond and surrounding fields
· Hanover Country Club Golf Course
· Pine Park Association land
· Athletic fields at Reservoir and Lyme Roads
· Playing field at Lyme Road and Dresden Road
· Corner of North Main and Clement Streets
· Corner of Buell and South Main Streets
· Corner of Allen and School Streets
· Corner of Maple Street and Lewin Road.
9. Encourage Dartmouth College to continue its commitment to a pedestrian-oriented campus.
10. Develop pedestrian paths on:
· East Wheelock Street east of Rip Road up to Grasse Road
· Grasse Road to Dartmouth College residential communities on Grasse Road.
11. Re-negotiate the Girl Brook Sewer/Trail Easement to allow bicycles to provide a safe bicycle route to the Ray School from the downtown area.
12. Connect the Girl Brook Sewer/Trail Easement with an accesssible path from Verona Avenue.
13. Protect the sewer easement between Downing and Sargent Streets with a conservation easement.
14. Re-negotiate the conservation easement along the Connecticut River at the Kendal at Hanover to allow pedestrian access.
15. Reclassify Highway 34 and the Wolfeboro Road over Oak Hill to Dogford Road to public trails.

Occum Pond
provides winter
sports for all.

V. OPEN SPACE PROTECTION
AND FINANCING METHODS

Just as motivations for open space preservation vary from person to person, and circumstance to circumstance, protection techniques vary to meet differing needs. Landowners may give or sell part or all of their interest in property. By means of easements, they may restrict some uses of a piece of land for a stated time span or in perpetuity. In some situations, development rights may be transferred from one site to a distant site owned by another party. The town can often zone or regulate to meet public needs. State and local tax codes may also assist in meeting open space protection objectives. In Hanover there is the additional option for purchase or assistance, provided by the establishment of the Conservation Fund.

The most effective way to meet the objectives of this open space plan will be utilization of a variety of protection techniques available to private landowners, non-profits, and the town. The techniques most commonly used in New Hampshire and elsewhere are described below, followed by a proposal for the first five years' use of the Conservation Fund.

PROTECTION OPTIONS

Acquisition of Fee Simple
One of the simplest open space protection techniques is for the town or other conservation entities to become the owner of the property. This is also the most secure method, as control of the property and how it used is the responsibility of the owner.

Acquisition of a property may be expensive in the case of purchase, or inexpensive in the case of donation. Purchase may be necessary when the land is threatened and the landowner is not willing or able to give the property to an entity interested in land conservation. Donation may provide the landowner with income tax benefits because the value of the real estate donated to a governmental or non-profit conservation organization is recognized in the tax code as a charitable contribution. Part of or all of the value of the land may be tax-deductible. Bargain sale at a less-than-market-value price is a financially attractive variant of an outright purchase. It benefits the town because the cost of purchase is less. It can also benefit the landowner because the difference between the bargain sale price and the fair market value may be considered a charitable contribution and therefore qualify as an income tax deduction.

Acquisition of Partial Interests in Land
Real estate is more than the piece of property; it carries with it a complex bundle of rights, including the right to improve the property, to mine the property, to take water from the property, to graze animals, to prevent others from visiting the property and to simply enjoy the property, to name a few examples. The bundle of rights and responsibilities that comprise land ownership may remain intact or may be allocated among a number of parties. Acquisition of fee simple means a person, or group of people, acquire the complete bundle of rights. Alternately, for example, the town might purchase a partial interest in the land, such as the right of public access. Acquisition of partial interests in land may occur by purchase, donation, or bargain sale.

Landowners interested in conserving their property, but retaining ownership, have discovered the conservation easement. Specifying the rights which will be separated from the property in a conservation easement deed, and selling or giving the deed to a conservation group or town is a common method of land protection in the Upper Valley. Many conservation easements, for example, restrict further subdivision of the property, and residential or commercial development. Commonly, easements may also limit excavation and major disturbance of the natural ground surface. Some conservation easements reserve particular rights for present and future owners such as the right to erect agricultural structures or to allow additions on existing residential structures. Some conservation easements cover only a portion of a lot, leaving the remainder available for development according to the land use controls in effect in the community.

Acquisition of a conservation easement by the town or conservation group means receiving a less than fee simple interest in property. Acquisition of a conservation easement is also called acquisition of development rights, because in most cases, conservation easements convey development rights from the owner to another party. Another type of partial interest that is commonly conveyed in Hanover is a trail easement. Sometimes the Planning Board requests that a trail easement be given to the town to improve the trail system in the process of reviewing a major subdivision or site plan application.

The acquisition of partial interests in land is usually less costly than the acquisition of the land fee simple, both in the short term and the long term. The long-term municipal costs include the responsibility for monitoring, and enforcement in the event of an easement violation. Other considerations include the relative security that comes with ownership, the loss of taxes and the stewardship expenses necessary for managing the land.

Transfer of Development Rights
A market for development rights can be established by creation of a transfer of development rights program. Typically, such a program is implemented in a town's zoning ordinance. Through the Master Plan and zoning processes, sending zones (areas to be less densely developed or conserved by sending some or all of their development rights away) are identified as important parts of the open space system. Receiving zones (areas to be more densely developed) must be designated. Purchasers of development rights can use the transferred development rights in the receiving zones. With a transfer of development rights program the market theoretically creates the open space system by removing the development rights from lands that should be left as open space and placing development in other specified locations.

In order to sell the development rights from land in a sending zone, an instrument similar to a conservation easement is executed. The transfer of development rights is carefully worked out when the system is set up by local ordinance, and subsequently monitored to keep track of the lands from which development rights have been sold.

Option & Right of First Refusal
In cases when there is a parcel of land that should be added to the open space system, but immediate purchase is not possible, an option or a right of first refusal are interim measures that could be arranged with the owner. They guarantee that there will be an opportunity to respond to the owner when the property is available for sale.

An option establishes a price at which the land could be purchased at any point during a specified period of time in the future. It gains time for raising money for the fee simple purchase, for completion of applications for grant assistance, for obtaining town appropriations, or whatever else is necessary to consummate the purchase.

A right of first refusal is less specific. It guarantees a future opportunity to purchase the land at a price equal to a bona fide offer from another party. It buys time, but does not establish a fixed price or date of purchase.

Options and rights of first refusal provide legal ways for eventual property ownership while providing time for organization and assembly of financial resources. Neither obligates the town to making the purchase, but the town should not employ these options unless there is a high probability the town will exercise the option. Options and rights of first refusal can be obtained at no cost, but are typically sold by the landowner.

Regulations
The application of regulations to maintain open space must be reasonably related to the public health, safety and welfare. Otherwise it might be deemed a taking of property without just compensation. There are a number of ways that land use regulations can successfully contribute to an open space system.

Land use regulations, particularly zoning, can be designed to keep open space free from development. This is precisely what the "NP" district in the Hanover Zoning Ordinance attempts to do. This zoning approach is unique and not suited to much of the land in town because land is zoned "NP" only at the request of the landowner. The limited development (only seasonal residences) and large lot sizes required in the "F" district have been crucial in reducing development pressure on the east side of Moose Mountain. However, while it has, to date, created an ambience in the eastern part of town, it does not specifically protect its natural resources. Therefore, additional conservation mechanisms should be used.

Regulations such as those contained in Article VII of the Zoning Ordinance (wetland and waterbody protection) effectively restrict development from impacting water resources in a major way, but at times, with review, do allow some development in the wetland and the surrounding buffer. Regulation of lot coverage and setbacks ensure that there is a mix of structures and open space on a lot.

Planned residential development and open space development regulations are designed to encourage a development plan which sets aside meaningful open space, typically for the use by the residents of the development. The key here is ensuring that the open space also contributes in a logical way to the open space system in town, has some relationship with the town-wide network, and provides some public open space benefit.

Regulatory approaches do not take land from the tax rolls and only require a commitment from the town to administer and enforce the provisions of the land use controls. However, regulatory approaches to open space protection are only a Town Meeting vote away from being abolished or changed to become less (or perhaps more) effective. The Town should not use the Conservation Fund to avoid enforcement of regulations.

Historic
structures in
traditional
settings are
part of
Hanover's
landscape.

Current Use Assessment
Current use assessment is designed to tax land at its "current use" value rather than at its "highest and best use" value. With reduced property tax under current use assessment, landowners may be better able to continue to own their land. As specified in RSA 79-A, current use assessment provides for reduced property assessments on parcels of field, farm, forest and wetland parcels which are at least ten acres in size, nature preserves, farmland generating annual revenues of at least a specific amount, and recreation land of any size. Once in the program, the land cannot be developed without the owner being assessed a penalty equivalent to 10% of the fair market value of the land taken out of current use.

While current use does not prevent a property from being developed, it provides an incentive to keep the land undeveloped, since annual taxes are lower.

MANAGEMENT OF THE CONSERVATION FUND
as authorized by RSA 36-A:5.1

At the 1999 Town Meeting, Hanover voters created the Conservation Fund. Money in the Conservation Fund may be expended by the Conservation Commission for any purpose authorized by the state of New Hampshire in by RSA 36-A (see Appendix I). Limitations are imposed by the Memorandum of Understanding between the Conservation Commission and Board of Selectmen (see Appendix II). Typically, these funds are used by conservation commissions for land acquisition and the costs associated with donation, purchase and management of land. This section of the Open Space Priorities Plan sets forth guidelines for management of Hanover's Conservation Fund, including implementation of this open space plan.

Composition of the Fund
The Conservation Fund was created in 1999 by combining a number of existing funds: Land Acquisition Fund, Land Maintenance Fund and 50% of the Land Acquisition and Capital Improvement Fund, and Capital Improvement Fund (Elm Street). In addition to this "nest egg", voters approved 50% of the land use change tax to be added to the Conservation Fund each year. Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding, 100% of the revenue from timber sales on town-owned lands and 100% of fines collected from conservation and environmental violations are accounted as revenue for the Conservation Commission General Fund budget. Any balance reserved at the end of the year from fines or timber sales will join the revenue stream that replenishes the Conservation Fund. The initial balance of the Conservation Fund was $176,998. Approximately $50,000 will be added to the Fund in 2000 from the use change tax.

Estimating the Revenue Stream for the Next Five Years
The use change tax is imposed when land that has been in current use no longer qualifies for current use tax treatment. State law authorizes a municipality to vote to deposit all or a portion of this tax in the conservation fund when it is collected. Towns in New Hampshire have chosen to allocate the use change tax receipts to their conservation funds in a variety of amounts, from 5% of the tax receipts to 100% of the tax receipts. Some towns place a ceiling on the amount that can be added to the Conservation Fund in any year, with ceiling amounts ranging from $1000 to $100,000. Others authorize deposits to their funds only after a certain amount has been raised. Hanover voters have approved an annual transfer of 50% of the use change tax receipts into the Conservation Fund. A vote of Town Meeting could change this proportion.

Over the past ten years, the average annual amount of use change tax generated by land being taken out of current use, has been $50,000. Assuming that the rate of land taken out of current use continues at the same rate for the next five years, it is anticipated that $25,000 per year, or $125,000 over the next five years, will be added to the Conservation Fund.

In the best case, a management plan will be developed for each of the forested tracts owned by the town. Such a plan would recommend a timetable for timber harvest for each tract. Using estimated timber yields from these plans, harvest values could be estimated. Currently, some but not all of the town-owned properties have management plans, so it is not possible to predict a revenue stream coming from each tract where timber harvest is planned might occur. Based on the town's consulting forester's estimate of revenue from timber sales, in the next five years, approximately $7,500 will be added to the Conservation Fund.

A system of conservation and environmental violation fines has not been instituted to date. To keep the estimates for spending from the Conservation Fund at a conservative level, the revenue stream from this source was estimated at $0.

The Conservation Fund is deposited in the New Hampshire Public Deposit Investment Pool. This is an interest-bearing account. Assuming that a balance for on-going stewardship is kept in the Conservation Fund of approximately $30,000, that conservation projects will reduce the Fund in a gradual way, and a 5% interest rate, there would be interest earned each year of around $3,500.

Based on this analysis, approximately $150,000 will be added to the Conservation Fund over the next five years. Added to the beginning balance, this amounts to approximately $330,000 to work with over the next five years.

Conservation Fund Initiatives - A Five Year Plan
Given the pace of development, the need to protect and conserve more open space in Hanover now is great. The town is committed to becoming a model land steward, proving its ability to care for the town's portion of the open space network, and setting a good example for other landowners and towns. Careful planning for Conservation Fund assets is needed, as both protection and stewardship will have to be funded from the fund.

Stewardship Fund
With conservation easements, of which the town now holds 35, comes the responsibility to monitor them and to enforce their terms. When an easement violation occurs, consultants may be needed to assist in litigating and remediating damages. Most land trusts have stewardship funds that support the costs incurred in the event of an easement violation. The Upper Valley Land Trust sets its one-time stewardship fee based on a calculation of the complexity of the easement and estimated future costs starting with a minimum of $1800. Many land trusts use their stewardship accounts to support easement-monitoring activities.

A stewardship fund of $30,000 should be established as a restricted fund within the Conservation Fund with the recognition that the town's General Fund will also continue to be used for these expenses. Interest from the stewardship fund should flow back into the Conservation Fund for land protection and other projects. Easement monitoring should be done by town staff, paid for out of operations, and volunteers.

Every time an easement is accepted, a stewardship fee of at least $1800 should be added to the stewardship fund. This fee could be covered by the Conservation Fund, by donations, or by the easement donor. The amount of the fee should be reassessed periodically.

Land Protection Assistance Fund
One excellent way for open space to be protected is for a landowner to voluntarily donate a conservation easement to a land trust or governmental entity. Landowners who have decided to generously give up development rights on their property are often surprised and dismayed by the costs associated with donation of a conservation easement. These include a property survey (if one does not already exist), a title search, legal counsel for preparation and/or review of the easement deed, stewardship fund fee, appraisal (if the easement is to count as a charitable contribution) and often land planning and/or financial planning assistance. Although the tax savings to the landowner resulting from the donation of a conservation easement typically exceed the associated costs, even the most willing and generous landowner can experience "sticker shock".

In order to encourage voluntary donations, the Conservation Commission should make $20,000 available annually to assist property owners with defraying the costs of easement donation (except for the landowner's appraisal and professional counsel fees solely for the landowner's tax deduction purposes), whether to the town, a land trust or to another governmental entity. The terms of the conservation easement must meet clear professional writing and legal standards and be agreeable to the Conservation Commission in order for the project to qualify for these funds.

Notice of the availability of these funds should be made by the end of May each year. Applications from landowners should be received by the Conservation Commission by August 1. Decisions should be made by the Commission on projects to be funded by September 1, or sooner, in order that projects could be completed by December 31 of that year. Land Protection Assistance money not awarded by September 1 should be available for other projects through the end of the town's fiscal year and should be carried forward to be made available in subsequent years when there may be more interest in easement donation. Specific guidelines for award of these funds should be established by the Conservation Commission. There may be extraordinary cases where exceptions can be made to this general funding schedule.

Permanent Protection of Town-Owned Land
There are approximately 20 town-owned parcels that are managed by the Conservation Commission as open space land. In order to assure that these lands will remain as permanent open space, the town should work with a land trust to devise a conservation easement to protect each parcel. Each year, $3,000 should be allocated from the Conservation Fund to work towards permanent protection of town-owned conservation lands.

Land Maintenance Budget
Five hundred dollars should be allocated per year from the Conservation Fund for development of a volunteer stewardship program, trail signs, maps, and other items for managing and publicizing use of town-owned land. (Management planning and hazard tree removal and trail work, including establishment of new trails, should continue to be funded through the consultant line item in the Conservation Commission's general fund budget.) Volunteer training in easement monitoring and trail and open space maintenance should be offered on a regular basis.

Land Protection
The balance of the Conservation Fund (an estimated $232,000 in the five-year period) should be available for supporting land protection initiatives. The Commission needs to be sure that purchased open space lands have high resource value. In every case where the Conservation Fund will be used, the Commission should seek conservation partners. The Upper Valley Land Trust, the Hanover Conservation Council, the Appalachian Trail Conference Land Trust, and Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests are all active land trusts which may have an interest in participating in a given land protection project in Hanover. There are also non-land trust conservation partners that could be utilized such as the Audubon Society of New Hampshire, the Connecticut River Joint Commissions, The Nature Conservancy, New England Wildflower Society, NH Extension Service and NH Coverts Project. Alternatively, this money could also be used to support a project initiated by one of these conservation partners.

In the case of conservation easement purchase, because of the long-term monitoring and enforcement responsibilities, it is advised that the town work in cooperation with a land trust and seek a land trust recipient for the conservation easement. In this way, the town and land trust work together to achieve open space protection but the town is not encumbered with the monitoring and enforcement time and financial commitments, particularly those that come with an enforcement action.

In order to make the limited Conservation Fund dollars stretch further in every possible case, there should be an attempt to leverage support from neighbors, conservation partners, other government agencies, foundations and/or the general public. This match could take the form of a bargain sale from the landowner.

Depending on the projects that are developed or come to the attention of the Conservation Commission, the Commission should decide in any given year whether to spend the entire amount on a single project or to divide this money for land protection among many projects.

Evaluating Potential Expenditures from the Conservation Fund
In its approach to spending limited conservation dollars, the Conservation Commission must be at once opportunistic and flexible, but also guided by the lands, objectives and criteria identified in this plan as it is consistent with the town Master Plan. Having established a structure for the open space network, it is a goal of the Commission to have that network completed. Thus, the lands described in this plan are considered to be priorities for protection.

However, should specific properties outside those mentioned in this plan that exhibit outstanding open space benefits come to the attention of the Commission, they should be considered for inclusion as a rational part of the open space system. For example, the availability of an undeveloped lot that could become an addition to the Town Forest whose location is not specifically cited in the Plan may be an excellent addition to the town's open space holdings. Likewise, a neighboring community might run a trail to the Hanover town line. A specific piece of property in Hanover may be necessary to link the trail to Hanover trails. This type of opportunistic purchase would provide an open space benefit to Hanover residents, even though the particular piece of property is not shown as part of the open space system at this time.

For every property whose protection might be funded by the Conservation Fund, natural and historic resources should be identified, and an assessment of the open space benefits must be completed, and the willingness of the land owner, the threat of development or disturbance of the natural systems, the costs and price all need to be considered. These measures should be used to evaluate the benefit of conserving one piece versus another piece of property. The Land Conservation Committee may wish to review the criteria used by other conservation organizations to evaluate high priority areas.

This management plan, which covers only the land protection assistance fund, permanent protection of town-owned properties, and land maintenance at the proposed levels, will leave the Conservation Fund depleted at the end of the five-year period. Nevertheless, good land stewardship and assistance to voluntary conservation easement donors need to continue. Hopefully, anticipated revenues from the use change tax, timber sales, and interest should cover those continuing responsibilities.

It is clear that one or more additional revenue sources must be identified. Public fund raising to capitalize a long-term land protection fund, or a bond issue, are two potential sources. Establishment of new sources will be a measure of the town's commitment to the open spaces that residents have identified, in several public surveys during the last 25 years, as very important elements of their town.

Conservation Fund- Summary of Proposed Cash Flow

Revenue(Expense) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Use Change Tax 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Timber Sales 7,500
Fines 0 0 0 0 0 0
Interest 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500
Stewardship (30,000)
Land Protection Assistance (20,000) (20,000) (20,000) (20,000) (20,000)
Perma Permanent Protection (3,000) (3,000) (3,000) (3,000) (3,000)
Land Maintenance ( 500) ( 500) ( 500) ( 500) ( 500)
Land Protection (46,500) (46,500) (46,500) (46,500) (46,500)
Restricted Stewardship $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
Available Balance $176,998 $200,498 $158,998 $124,998 $83,498 $41,998 $ 498



Town of Hanover / PO Box 483, Hanover, NH 03755 / 603-643-0742 / www.hanovernh.org / townmgr@hanovernh.org
Hanover Home / Calendar / News / Contact us