|
| Municipal Building, 41 South Main St., Hanover, NH / 603-643-0708 | |||
|   | ||||
| You are here: Home | Planning and Zoning | 2.2.3 The HIC block Search | ||||
|     | ||||
|
Applications Rural Study Group 2007 |
2.2.3 The HIC block2.2.3 The Hanover Investment Corporation (HIC) Block (bounded by Lebanon, South Street, South College Street and Sanborn Road). As the largest redevelopment site in the Downtown, this block is of obvious strategic importance. The opportunity to prepare a comprehensive development project is enhanced by the fact that its owner, a College-owned corporation, is committed to ensuring that Hanover's Downtown remains a healthy, livable, and high-quality environment. Because of the block's large size (approx. 2.8 acres) and consolidated ownership, there exists an opportunity to redevelop the site in a manner that addresses many of the perceived 'needs' identified through the consultation process for the Downtown. Based on a gross site FAR of 2.0 (assumes 60% site coverage, 4 floor buildings and below-grade parking) this block could accommodate a theoretical maximum of 292,000 s.f. The two priority needs are: · Affordable housing, including units suitable for families. Other needs considered include: · Office space During the course of this study the ongoing discussion on the future expansion of the High School and Middle School facilities expanded to include a potential relocation scenario whereby the two schools would be relocated to a College-owned site on Lyme Road. There is a clear desire expressed by Hanover residents to retain the Schools as a vital part of the Downtown. Financial considerations aside, from the perspective of maintaining a vibrant downtown, it is in the interests of the Downtown to maintain the Schools in their present location. However should financial considerations compel the Schools to move from the Lebanon Street site, and should their present building sites (approx. 5.0 acres) become available for redevelopment, this will have a profound impact on how the Town addresses its need for more medium-density housing. For instance if a townhouse type development of 30 units per acre were built on this site (while maintaining a substantial landscaped setback of 30 ft. from Lebanon Street), approximately 150 units suitable for families could be provided in this location. This scenario assumes that all existing open, green spaces are left intact. It is important to consider this potential scenario for the School site if only to put a broader perspective on the evaluation of the best use for the HIC lands. In this scenario the provision of 150 units of housing not far from the HIC lands may reduce the pressure to use the HIC lands primarily for residential purposes. The vision for the Downtown is predicated on establishing firm boundaries to avoid commercial expansion into established residential areas. Long-term commercial growth will therefore be confined to a very restricted area. If the vision for Downtown 20+ years from now also includes the ability to expand commercial opportunities (retail, entertainment, food services and office uses) the HIC lands are strategically important as they provide the largest site suitable for commercial infill. This does not point to an either/or dilemma. Given the uncertainty of the School's site, the HIC lands should not necessarily be planned under the assumption that housing will be provided elsewhere. New development on the HIC lands should allow for future flexibility that will allow residential units to be converted into commercial uses as demand dictates. This flexibility can be achieved by the design of buildings with appropriate dimensional and construction characteristics that allow for this conversion. This suggests a building typology that is less house-form in character. Appropriate models may be the Bridgman Building and Davison Block on South Main Street that combine retail at grade with upper floors that combine both residential and office uses (see section 2.7.4 Height Restrictions). Consideration should be given in the zoning to provide for a 10 foot front setback within which encroachments can be made for one or two-storey elements including projecting bay windows, glazed entrances, canopies, colonnades, and other interior or exterior elements which will assist in forming a variety of setbacks along the street frontage and a range of "human-scale" elements (figures 14-17). The scale of development should also be limited such that no single building elements are wider than 80 ft. and that multiple passageways at least 15 ft. wide between buildings be allowed for. An exception to this guideline may be the Library, which, if situated on the corner of Lebanon and Sanborn, may require a larger frontage.
Given the potential energy that may be accomplished on the north side of Lebanon with the future expansion of the Hopkins Center, Hood Museum and other College facilities, and in combination with a new civic space active during the day and evening (as envisioned in the concept for the Row) the theme of an 'Arts District', including the HIC lands may form an appropriate design and planning framework for this area. Live/Work uses should be encouraged in the zoning ordinance so that a portion of the HIC lands can be developed as flexible, loft-type units suitable for residential use, arts studio-based businesses, start-up Information Technology businesses or a combination of the above. This eclectic mix of uses will be an asset in creating a vibrant, animated area in the Downtown. In this scenario the northerly portion of the Sanborn right-of-way will be available to provide a larger development site area as part of the HIC parcel. This in turn could give greater flexibility for the development of a new Howe Library and a below-grade parking facility. The HIC lands in this area are recommended to be rezoned as part of a new D district (see section 2.7 for a description of this zoning category). Two scenarios should be considered for this rezoning. Option 1 would rezone the entire block bounded by Lebanon, South College, South and Sanborn Road as part of the proposed D-1 district providing for buildings up to 45 feet in height throughout the block (figure 19). A minimum 5-foot setback is recommended for the top floor as a means to reduce the perceived height of buildings in the D-1 areas.
|
|||